Utilization of Mental Health Services Within 1 Year of Delivery among Different Language Groups.

OBJECTIVES: Cultural differences can affect postpartum mental health disorders and the utilization of mental health services. We compared women speaking English, Spanish, Russian, and Urdu/Bengali/Punjabi from postpartum through 1 year after delivery. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 3478 pregnant women from a public hospital in New York City. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of the presence of any of the following: diagnosis of depressive disorder, diagnosis of anxiety disorder, visit to a behavioral health service provider, and/or psychiatric admission. The secondary outcome was healthcare provider referral to a behavioral health service provider. RESULTS: Languages spoken were English (n = 1881), Spanish (n = 694), Russian (n = 600), and Urdu/Bengali/Punjabi (n = 303). The language groups differed significantly (P = 0.02) for the composite outcome, with English having the greatest percentage (3.5%) and Russian the lowest percentage (1.2%). The language groups significantly differed for referral to behavioral health (P = 0.04), with Spanish having the greatest percentage (1.6%) and Russian the lowest percentage (0.2%). Anxiety disorder history (odds ratio [OR] 10.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.75-22.91, P < 0.001) and psychiatric disorder history (OR 5.26, 95% CI 2.13-8.49, P < 0.001) were each significantly associated with increased odds for the composite outcome. Anxiety disorder history (OR 6.42, 95% CI 1.92-21.45, P = 0.003) and elevated depressive symptoms (OR 4.92, 95% CI 2.04-11.83, P < 0.001) each were significantly associated with increased odds for referral to behavioral health. CONCLUSIONS: Russian language was associated with lower utilization of mental health services postpartum. These findings can help clinicians determine among postpartum women who will be affected with mental health concerns and who will seek treatment for mental health concerns.

Pulmonologist Education of the Teach-to-Goal Inhaler Technique for Those With Asthma and COPD.

BACKGROUND: Inhaler education for patients with asthma and patients with COPD is typically provided by non-pulmonologists. We studied inhaler education by pulmonologists to determine changes in clinical outcomes and inhaler use. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 296 subjects diagnosed with asthma, COPD, or both that evaluated use of inhaler technique education and its impact on (1) inhaler/dosage change consisting of dosage change in the same class of inhaler and/or change in number of inhalers, (2) forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC%), (3) disease symptom control, (4) out-patient visits, (5) urgent care visits (6) emergency department visits, and (7) hospital admissions. One group received inhaler technique education by a pulmonologist while the other group did not. RESULTS: The pulmonologist inhaler technique-educated group had significantly decreased relative risk for inhaler/dosage increase (relative risk 0.57 [95% CI 0.34-0.96], P = .03) and significantly increased odds for symptom control (odds ratio 2.15 [95% CI 1.24-3.74], P = .01) at 1-y follow-up as compared to the no education group. No differences occurred for FEV1/FVC%, out-patient visits, urgent care visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonologist education of inhaler technique for patients with asthma and patients with COPD was associated with decreased relative risk for inhaler/dosage increase and increased odds for symptom control. We recommend pulmonologists provide education of inhaler technique to patients with asthma and patients with COPD and not rely on non-pulmonologist education alone. Prospective research is needed to confirm the importance of proper inhaler techniques.

Roe v. Wade Overturned: The Association of Acculturation with Interest in and Awareness of Hospital Services for Family Planning Among Hispanic Women.

Introduction: The overturning of Roe v. Wade impacted family planning services in many areas of the United States (US). Our study investigates the association of acculturation with interest in and awareness of family planning hospital services of contraception and elective termination of pregnancy among Hispanic women. Methods: We surveyed 306 Hispanic women at a public hospital in a Long Island suburb of New York City. Predictor variables were acculturation (language, media, ethnic social relations) measured by the Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics and years lived in the US. Outcome variables were interest in and awareness of hospital services of family planning for elective abortion and non-elective non-abortion family planning methods. Results: For interest in hospital services, both language and ethnic social relations acculturation were significantly positively associated with almost all family planning methods whether abortion or non-abortion. However, media acculturation and years lived in the US were significantly positively associated with abortion but not the non-abortion methods. For awareness of hospital services, only language acculturation was significantly positively associated with abortion and some nonelective non-abortion family planning methods. Conclusion: We recommend that healthcare providers and hospitals should be aware of acculturation levels when providing counseling and information about family planning methods to Hispanic women.

Bolus Feeding Via Gastric Versus Oral Routes in Very Preterm Neonates.

BACKGROUND: We intend to investigate the association of bolus orogastric tube (BOG) and nipple bottle (N) feedings with postnatal growth in very premature neonates (VPN: gestational age between 28 and 33 weeks). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The days of life (DOL) to achieve full combined oral and gastric enteral nutrition (FEN) and attain body weight (BW) of 2200 g (Wt22) and the length of hospitalization (LOH) were retrospectively associated with clinical and BOG and N feeding-related variables via multivariate regression analyses. Correlations were performed to ascertain the strength of associations. RESULTS: In a cohort of 127 VPN, FEN demonstrated negative associations with gestational age (GA) and LOH and Wt22 with birth weight (BW). FEN showed positive associations with nil by mouth and intravenous fluid-nutrition days and with DOL to start and achieve full nipple feeding. LOH was associated with days on antibiotics and DOL to start and achieve full nipple feeding. Wt22 was associated with DOL to achieve full nipple feeding. The start day of BOG feeding had no independent associations and weak, highly significant positive correlations with Wt22, LOH, and FEN. CONCLUSION: Bolus orogastric tube feeding has no independent implications for postnatal growth, duration of hospitalization, or chronological age to attain full enteral nutrition in VPN unless combined with nipple feeding to provide enteral nutrition. Oral bottle feeding accelerates postnatal catch-up growth and full enteral nutrition acquisition while reducing hospitalization duration. Initiating nipple feeding at 32 weeks of postmenstrual age may be safe in stable VPN. Antibiotic therapy increases hospitalization duration.

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Routine Prenatal Care: Use of Online Visits.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether prenatal visits or screening/testing were fewer or occurred later during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (CINT) as compared to the prior year (PreCINT). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study compared CINT (n = 2,195) to PreCINT (n = 2,395) at seven public hospitals in New York City. The primary outcome was total number of prenatal-care visits. Secondary outcomes were components of prenatal-care visits completion, timing of standard pregnancy screening tests, and adverse neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: CINT patients had more total prenatal-care visits (B = 1.30, 95% CI:1.04, 1.56, p < 0.001), lower odds for initiation of prenatal care which was inadequate according to widely used criteria (OR:0.39, 95% CI:0.34, 0.45, p < 0.001), and lower gestational age at initial visit (B=-4.51, 95% CI:-5.10, -3.93, p < 0.001) than PreCINT patients. In-person visits did not differ between the two groups. PreCINT patients had no televisits, while CINT patients had a median of one televisit (Median = 1, p < 0.001). CINT patients had increased odds for group B Streptococcus screening (OR:1.27, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.48, p = 0.001), quadrivalent screening (OR:1.30, 95% CI:1.15, 1.48, p < 0.001), and anatomy sonogram (OR:2.30, 95% CI:2.04, 2.59, p < 0.001) but decreased odds for glucose challenge test screening (OR:0.81, 95% CI:0.72, 0.91, p < 0.001). Adverse neonatal outcome did not differ between CINT and PreCINT pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Despite the difficulties and perceived dangers of in-person visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, the COVID-19 pandemic had little negative impact upon the outpatient prenatal care received by patients in this hospital system.

Psychological variables related to decision making for mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Mask wearing can prevent and/or mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Psychological variables related to decision making can potentially influence mask wearing. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE: We surveyed college students (N = 1,085) about wearing a mask inside a store and outside on a busy street. Predictor variables were demographics, COVID-19 variables, and psychological variables of health risk taking, recreational risk taking, consideration of immediate consequences, and consideration of future consequences. RESULTS: Health risk taking was negatively associated with mask wearing outside on a busy street but was not associated with mask wearing inside a store. Recreational risk taking was not associated with mask wearing either inside a store or outside on a busy street. Consideration of future consequences was significantly positively associated with mask wearing both inside a store and outside on a busy street. Consideration of immediate consequences was not associated with mask wearing either inside a store or outside on a busy street. CONCLUSIONS: Marketing about store safety requirements of mask wearing may turn certain customers away from shopping inside the store. Their personality may not be of future consequences orientation and no matter how much one attempts to educate or reason with them, these customers will be opposed to mask wearing. Managers then need to decide whether to potentially lose a customer by requiring the customer to wear a mask to shop inside the store.

Association of Maternal Preferred Language with Breastfeeding Attitudes, Intentions, and Knowledge.

INTRODUCTION: Assessing intentions, attitudes, and knowledge about breastfeeding among different language groups is important because the languages reflect cultural differences. We compared attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, intentions, and knowledge of breastfeeding among mothers with the five most common preferred languages spoken at a New York City hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed women (n = 448) in the prenatal clinic and the post-partum unit of a New York City hospital. The survey questions were about breastfeeding attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, and intentions, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. We also administered the Iowa Infant Feeding and Attitude Scale and measured the knowledge of the mothers about breastfeeding. The preferred language spoken by the mother was the main predictor variable. English, Russian, Spanish, Urdu, and Uzbek were the languages studied. RESULTS: Multivariate linear regression analyses showed that Russian (B = 2.24, SE = 1.09, p = 0.04), Urdu (B = 2.90, SE = 1.45, p = 0.046), and Uzbek (B = 4.21, SE = 1.35, p = 0.002) speakers all had significantly more positive attitudes toward breastfeeding than did English speakers. Spanish and English language speakers did not differ from each other in their attitudes towards breastfeeding. The language groups did not differ significantly for subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, intention to breastfeed, the Iowa Infant Feeding and Attitude Scale, nor in knowledge regarding breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: Urdu, Uzbek, and Russian speakers had significantly more positive attitudes towards breastfeeding than did English speakers. To the extent that preferred language is a proxy for culture, clinicians can use this parameter as a basis for directing approaches toward lactation education.

Withstanding the test of time: Morning versus afternoon/evening urine protein-to-creatinine ratios in preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: There are mixed findings regarding time preference for measuring spot urine protein to creatinine ratios (UPCR) in renal patients but no such literature among pregnant patients. We compare AM versus PM measurements for UPCR among pregnant patients with preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study included 163 patients diagnosed with preeclampsia. Laboratory tests of UPCR, urine specificity gravity, and uric acid were collected for these patients during the morning (AM) 12:00 AM (00:00) through 11:59 AM (11:59) and afternoon/evening (PM) 12:00 PM (12:00) through 11:59 PM (23:59). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were UPCR percentages indicative of preeclampsia, UPCR median values, abnormal uric acid, and normal urine specific gravity indicative of a quality sample for measuring UPCR. RESULTS: UPCR ≥ 0.3 indicative of preeclampsia significantly differed (p < 0.001) where the AM group (76.7 %) had a greater percentage than the PM group (52.8 %). Median UPCR significantly differed (p < 0.001) where the AM group had a greater median (0.44) than the PM group (0.32). None of the uric acid or urine specific gravity comparisons significantly differed between the AM and PM groups. Similar patterns occurred for subgroups of those with hypertension, nulliparous, and preeclampsia with severe features. CONCLUSION: We found that UPCR had greater median values and more values indicative of preeclampsia for AM measurements than PM measurements. Clinicians who use spot urine measurements and not 24-hour urine measurements should preferably measure UPCR in the AM rather than the PM.

Ocular and orbital manifestations of granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a systematic review of published cases.

Objective: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by necrotizing granulomatous inflammation of small and medium-sized vessels. This systematic review aimed to highlight the most common ophthalmic manifestations and to uncover their associations with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) positivity and the presence of granulomas. Methods: A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases was performed from journal inception to March 21, 2021, for case reports and a series of ophthalmic GPAs. Cytoplasmic-ANCA (c-ANCA), perinuclear-ANCA (p-ANCA), and granulomas were analyzed against many ophthalmic signs and symptoms. 306 patients with GPA were retrospectively studied. Results: Granulomas were present in 47.7% of our sample, c-ANCA in 59.2%, and p-ANCA in 10.8%. Scleritis was significantly associated with higher odds for c-ANCA positivity. Eye discharge, episcleritis, proptosis, and central nervous system (CNS) involvement were each significantly associated with lower odds for c-ANCA positivity. Orbital mass was significantly associated with lower odds for p-ANCA positivity. CNS involvement was significantly associated with higher odds for p-ANCA positivity (OR:3.08, 95% CI:1.02, 9.36, p=0.047) and orbital mass was significantly associated with lower odds for p-ANCA positivity. Conclusions: We recommend that clinicians should consider ocular or orbital GPA in patients presenting with non-specific eye complaints, such as vision impairment, orbital mass, or proptosis, and obtain further assessments to determine the possible presence of granuloma, c-ANCA, or p-ANCA. Abbreviations: GPA = Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis, ANCA = antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, c-ANCA = cytoplasmic-ANCA, p-ANCA = perinuclear-ANCA, CNS = central nervous system, AAVs = ANCA-associated vasculitides, SD = standard deviation, GU = genitourinary, ENT = ear nose and throat, OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.

Dose adjustment of rheumatology and allergy/immunology medications in chronic kidney disease: awareness and knowledge among internal medicine housestaff.

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk for adverse drug events due to medication dosing errors. We studied the awareness and knowledge among internal medicine housestaff (IMHS) of proper dose adjustment of commonly used rheumatology and allergy/immunology medications for patients with CKD. Methods: We surveyed 353 IMHS to evaluate their awareness of the need for medication dose adjustments for patients with CKD and knowledge for medication adjustment by level of glomerular filtration rate for common rheumatology and allergy/immunology medications. Results: There was lack of awareness and knowledge for both rheumatology and allergy/immunology medications. Incorrect awareness and knowledge were as follows: allopurinol, 21.2%, 73.4%; colchicine, 19.0%, 75.9%; diphenhydramine, 34.0%, 34.0%; loratadine, 82.2%, 93.2%; and montelukast, 34.0%, 34.0%, respectively. Exploratory logistic regression analyses showed that PGY1 residents had higher odds for lack of awareness for allopurinol (odds ratio [OR] 24.57, 95% CI [confidence interval] 4.69, 99.13, P < 0.001), colchicine (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.50, 10.51, P < 0.01), diphenhydramine (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.10, 4.54, P < 0.04), and montelukast (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.20, 5.00, P < 0.05) than PGY3 residents. A nephrology rotation in medical school was associated with lower odds for incorrect knowledge for allopurinol (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25, 0.87, P < 0.05) and montelukast (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27, 0.92, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Overall, awareness and knowledge were poor among IMHS for dose adjustments of rheumatology and allergy/immunology medications in patients with CKD. Proper education and exposure to nephrology during training may improve quality and safety of care for patients with CKD.

Progression From Steroid Injection to Surgery in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients With Concurrent Ulnar Nerve Compression: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Steroid injections are a common treatment option in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). This study assesses various prognostic factors for progression to carpal tunnel release (CTR) after a first-time steroid injection for CTS with specific focus on concomitant ulnar nerve compression (UNC). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 426 hands with CTS treated with a first-time steroid injection in the Long Island region of New York. The main predictor variable was UNC measured in two analytical models of positive UNC and location of UNC (wrist or elbow). Multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for demographic, medical, and CTS-related variables for 2 study outcomes occurring within 1 year: (1) CTR; and (2) steroid reinjection. RESULTS: Overall progression to CTR within 1 year of steroid injection was 23.0%. Ulnar nerve compression was present in 16.7% of patients and was significantly associated with increased odds for CTR but not with steroid reinjection. These results were further localized to be specific for UNC at the elbow. A moderate or severe result on electrodiagnostic studies was associated with increased odds for CTR. Increased age was associated with slightly increased odds of steroid reinjection while a history of distal radius fracture was associated with decreased odds of steroid reinjection. CONCLUSIONS: Carpal tunnel syndrome patients with UNC may benefit from earlier definitive treatment with CTR rather than attempting steroid injections, as they are more likely to seek reintervention within 1 year of their initial injection.

Outpatient percutaneous image-guided microwave ablation with monitored anesthesia care: An exploratory study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and periprocedural perception of pain for a combination approach of moderate and deep sedation for image-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of both primary and secondary malignant lesions. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 33 image-guided percutaneous microwave ablation procedures performed on 33 patients in an outpatient-based interventional radiology center. We used a combination of midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and/or ketamine to achieve mild to moderate sedation for the procedure, and also to achieve deeper sedation as needed for the ablation portion. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all image-guided percutaneous microwave ablation procedures. Mean procedural time was 49.4 min. There were no major complications. Intraprocedural pain was absent in all patients. All 33 patients were deemed fit for discharge within 30 min following the procedure. CONCLUSION: The combination approach of moderate and deep sedation for anesthesia during image-guided percutaneous microwave ablation is an advantageous option. This approach has a strong safety profile, good technical success, short procedure times, low levels of intraprocedural and post-procedural pain, and short recovery from anesthesia.

Sharp Versus Electric Suction Curettage in Gynecologic Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Suction curettage is preferred over sharp curettage in obstetric settings. We compare the quality of operative tissue sampling between sharp curettage and suction curettage using electric vacuum aspiration for nonobstetric abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Community hospital in Long Island, New York. PATIENTS: Women ages 21 to 45 years (n = 257) who underwent operative curettage procedure for nonobstetric abnormal uterine bleeding. INTERVENTIONS: Independent ratings of specimens from suction curettage using electric vacuum aspiration and sharp curettage by 2 pathologists blinded to method of tissue collection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was percentage of organized tissue, indicative of a higher-quality pathology specimen. Specimens obtained by electric suction curettage (p <.001) had a significantly higher percentage of organized tissue (M = 66.28, SD = 20.33) than sharp curettage (M = 55.51, SD = 24.17). There were no differences between the curettage groups for operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, or pathology diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Specimens obtained with suction curettage contained more organized tissue with similar pathologist satisfaction and confidence scores than sharp curettage. We suggest clinicians consider electric suction curettage in the diagnostic workup of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women. In addition, patient-centered benefits include no increase in operative time, blood loss, or complication rate compared with sharp curettage.

Survey of COVID-19 Vaccine Attitudes in Predominately Minority Pregnant Women.

OBJECTIVES: Despite recommendations for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination during pregnancy, some pregnant women are concerned about COVID-19 vaccines and decline to be vaccinated. This study focuses on attitudes in a sample of mostly minority pregnant Hispanic and Black women that may influence vaccine hesitancy. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of 400 pregnant women. Participants were provided with a one-page information sheet on pregnancy health, COVID-19 health, and COVID-19 vaccines. They were then asked to complete a survey on attitudes about these topics. RESULTS: We found that attitudes for knowing about the health topics were in the range from agree to strongly agree, whereas attitudes for knowing about topics pertaining to COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines were in a lower-level range from neutral to agree. Negative vaccine attitudes were significantly associated with decreased agreement for knowing about health attitudes, but not significantly associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccine attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccine mRNA technology was a lesser understood topic than attitudes for knowing about other health topics. This finding suggests the need for physician intervention and that further education about COVID-19 vaccine mRNA technology may influence patient attitudes toward acceptance of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in pregnancy.

Social Capital from Online Social Media is Associated with Visiting a Healthcare Practitioner at Least Once a Year Among College Students.

: Social capital is positively associated with healthcare access such as healthcare practitioner visits. There does not appear to be any literature on social capital through online social media and its association with healthcare access such as healthcare practitioner visits. This paper studies the relationship between social capital through online social media use and healthcare practitioner visits. Methods: Data were analyzed from 663 participants in New York City in 2017 with exposure to social media prescription medication advertisements from social media (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube). The main predictor variable was visiting a healthcare practitioner at least once a year. Outcome variables were bonding social capital and bridging social capital from online social media. Results: Those who visited a healthcare practitioner at least once a year had greater mean bonding social capital and bridging social capital from online social media than those who did not visit a healthcare practitioner at least once a year. Multivariate linear regression analyses showed a similar pattern for not visiting a healthcare practitioner at least once a year (bonding social capital: b=-5.31, SE=1.68, p=0.002; bridging social capital: b=-3.27, SE=1.55, p=0.04). Conclusions: Government organizations, healthcare practitioners, and healthcare organizations should continue marketing and disseminating health education for young adults through online social media. This public health online social media health education is likely to be considered bonding social capital and/or bridging social capital by young adults and this may be associated with more young adults visiting healthcare practitioners at least once a year.

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis in adults: a systematic review and analysis.

PURPOSE: To analyze predictors of treatment outcome for anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis in adults. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, PsycInfo, and OVID. We included 424 patients from case reports and case series. Demographics, anti-NMDAR antibodies, prodromal and presenting symptoms, diagnostic workup, and treatment variables were recorded. Inferential analyses were performed in the subset (n = 299) of those with known treatment outcomes. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis for treatment outcome compared full recovery versus partial recovery and full recovery versus death. RESULTS: Treatment outcomes consisted of 34.67% full recovery (n = 147), 30.90% partial recovery (n = 131), 4.95% death (n = 21), and 29.48% unknown (n = 125). Speech/language abnormality and abnormal electroencephalogram (EEG) were each significantly associated with a higher relative risk for a full recovery. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis were each significantly associated with a higher relative risk for partial recovery. The analysis comparing death to full recovery found that catatonia was significantly associated with a lower relative risk for death. Increased age, orofacial dyskinesia, and no tumor removal were each significantly associated with a higher relative risk for death. CONCLUSION: Increased age, orofacial dyskinesia, and no tumor removal were associated with a higher relative risk for death in anti-NMDAR encephalitis in adults. Clinicians should monitor and appropriately treat anti-NMDAR encephalitis with these findings to minimize the risk of death.

Hand hygiene behavior change: a review and pilot study of an automated hand hygiene reminder system implementation in a public hospital.

Objective: To review and study implementation of an automated hand hygiene reminder system (AHHRS). Design: Prospective, nonrandomized, before-after quality improvement pilot study conducted over 6 months. Setting: Medical-surgical unit (MSU) and medical intensive care unit (MICU) at a public hospital in New York City. Participants: There were 2,642 healthcare worker observations in the direct observation (DO) period versus 265,505 in the AHHRS period, excluding AHHRS observations collected during the 1-month crossover period when simultaneous DO occurred. Intervention: We compared hand hygiene adherence (HHA) measured by DO prior to the pilot and after AHHRS implementation. We compared changes in HHA and potential cross-contamination events (CCEs) (room exit and subsequent entry without HHA) from baseline for each biweekly period during the pilot. Results: Engagement, education/training, data transparency, and optimization period resulted in successful implementation and adoption of the AHHRS. Observations were greater utilizing AHHRS than DO (265,505 vs 2,642, P < .01). Due to the expected Hawthorne effect, HHA was significantly less for AHHRS than DO in MSU (90.99% vs 97.21%, P < .01) and MICU (91.21% vs 98.65%, P < .01). HHA significantly improved from 86.47% to 89.68% in MSU (P < .001) and 85.93% to 91.24% in the MICU (P < .001) from the first biweekly period of AHHRS utilization to the last. CCE decreased from 73.42% to 65.11% in the MSU and significantly decreased from 81.22% to 53.19% in the MICU (P < .05). Conclusions: We describe how an AHHRS approach was successfully implemented at our facility. With ongoing feedback and system optimization, AHHRS improved HHA and reduced CCE over time.

A retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes between hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who received famotidine or pantoprazole.

Background and Aim: There is limited research on the use of histamine-H2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors for treating COVID-19. We compare clinical outcomes between patients hospitalized with COVID-19 receiving famotidine or pantoprazole. Methods: This retrospective study included 2184 patients (famotidine: n = 638, pantoprazole: n = 727, nonuse: n = 819) aged 18 years or older treated for COVID-19 from March 2020 to March 2021. Patients who received both famotidine and pantoprazole treatments were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was used for the primary outcome, namely all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes, namely mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, acute kidney injury, and gastrointestinal bleeding. The main predictor variable was the use of famotidine or pantoprazole. Covariates were demographics, chronic diseases, and symptoms. Results: As compared to nonuse, famotidine (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.20-0.44, P < 0.001) and pantoprazole (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.33-0.66, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with lower odds for all-cause mortality. Comparison of famotidine and pantoprazole showed that the former had lower odds for all-cause mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% CI:0.45-0.95, P < 0.05), mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.25-0.58, P < 0.001), vasopressor use (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.22-0.48, P < 0.001), acute kidney injury (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.30-0.54, P < 0.001), and gastrointestinal bleeding (OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.29, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Famotidine is associated with lower odds for all-cause mortality, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, acute kidney injury, and gastrointestinal bleeding as compared to pantoprazole in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. We recommend that clinicians consider the use of famotidine over pantoprazole for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Future research with a clinical trial would be beneficial to further support such use of famotidine.

Blood pressure medication use and postpartum hospital readmission among preeclampsia patients.

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure medication is often prescribed to patients with preeclampsia. We are not aware of any study on readmission of those with preeclampsia to the hospital that considers blood pressure medication use or dose. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 440 preeclampsia patients diagnosed during the antepartum, intrapartum, or immediate postpartum period prior to discharge from the hospital. The outcome was hospital readmission. One analysis compared blood pressure medication (oral labetalol and oral extended release nifedipine) use and nonuse. Another analysis compared low-dose and high-dose blood pressure medication use. RESULTS: Blood pressure medication use was not significantly associated with readmission (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.39, 1.63, p = 0.53). Low dose of blood pressure medication was significantly associated with increased odds for readmission (OR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.00, 5.25, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: We found that low dose of blood pressure medication was associated with increased odds for readmission within 6 weeks among those with preeclampsia. We recommend that clinicians balance the preference to reduce a blood pressure medication dose with the possible concern that too low a dose may place certain patients on track for hospital readmission after discharge.

Visual estimation of blood loss versus quantitative blood loss for maternal outcomes related to obstetrical hemorrhage.

Background: This study was undertaken to evaluate if there are differences between visual estimation of blood loss (EBL) and quantitative blood loss (QBL) for maternal outcomes related to obstetrical hemorrhage. Methods: This retrospective study compared EBL (n = 500) to QBL (n = 501) for outcomes of length of stay, readmission within 30 days of discharge, percent receiving blood transfusions, time between delivery to receiving blood transfusion, and postpartum hemoglobin level. Results: The QBL group had a significantly lower mean length of stay than the EBL group (2.6 vs 3.2 days, P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis adjusting for relevant covariates had a similar finding of lower length of stay for QBL vs EBL (B = -0.13, SE = 0.01, P < 0.001). Readmission within 30 days, blood transfusion, time to transfusion since delivery, and postpartum hemoglobin did not significantly differ between the QBL and EBL groups. Conclusion: We recommend that clinicians adopt QBL over EBL as standard practice since QBL is associated with lower length of stay and does not negatively impact other clinical outcomes.